The Kazakh Ministry of Transport has published the preliminary report on the accident involving the Embraer ERJ 190-100 IGW, registration 4K-AZ65, operated by Azerbaijan Airlines (AZAL). The crash, which occurred on December 25, 2024, near Aktau, Kazakhstan, resulted in 38 fatalities and raised a series of questions that could modify the initial narrative regarding the cause of the accident.What was initially described as a possible collision with birds has evolved into a more complex line of investigation. According to the document, structural damage to the aircraft and the presence of metallic objects in the fuselage have led investigators to consider the possibility of an external impact before the accident.<section class="noteSuggested" data-id="34713" data-title="You might be interested"></section><h3>From a technical issue to an uncontrollable emergency</h3>Flight J2-8243 took off from Baku bound for Grozny, but faced difficulties landing at its original destination. After two failed approach attempts, the crew decided to return to Baku, but the situation quickly deteriorated.At 05:13 UTC, aircraft records show that a total loss of control systems occurred, forcing the crew to make the decision to head to Aktau for an emergency landing. From that moment on, the report suggests a progressive deterioration of the aircraft, with the activation of multiple alerts in the cockpit, including hydraulic pressure loss and depressurization.<figure class="image"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/02/accidente_azerbaijian_1_1.jpg" alt="Accidente Azerbaijan 1"><figcaption>Ph: Ministry of Transport of Kazakhstan</figcaption></figure>One of the key statements in the report indicates that the crew reported an explosion in the rear of the aircraft, followed by sudden depressurization. This detail is crucial, as it could rule out the hypothesis that the aircraft simply suffered a technical failure and instead point to an external event.<h3>Damage analysis: the evidence raising doubts</h3>The report details an extensive analysis of the Embraer 190 wreckage, highlighting significant damage to the tail section, horizontal stabilizer, and left engine. Some of these damages have been described as perforations in the fuselage, which has generated new hypotheses about the cause of the accident.<figure class="image"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/02/accidente_azerbaijian.jpg" alt="Accidente Azerbaijan"><figcaption>Ph: Ministry of Transport of Kazakhstan</figcaption></figure>Among the most relevant elements of the forensic analysis is the recovery of metallic fragments embedded in the aircraft's structure, particularly in the tail section and hydraulic system. Experts have determined that these pieces were not part of the Embraer 190, which reinforces the possibility that the aircraft was hit by an external object in flight.<figure class="image"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/02/accidente_azerbaijian_3.png" alt="Accidente Azerbaijan 3"><figcaption>Ph: Ministry of Transport of Kazakhstan</figcaption></figure>Additionally, damage was found in the hydraulic lines, suggesting that the aircraft suffered a progressive loss of control due to lack of pressure in its critical systems. This loss of control would have led the aircraft into a situation where the crew could only maneuver using the engines, an extremely complex emergency procedure with low chances of success.<figure class="image"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/02/accidente_azerbaijian_2.png" alt="Accidente Azerbaijan 2"><figcaption>Ph: Ministry of Transport of Kazakhstan</figcaption></figure><h3>Collision with birds or impact from an external object?</h3>Since the beginning of the investigation, one of the main hypotheses was the ingestion of birds into the engines, which could have caused the aircraft's systems to malfunction. However, the report does not present conclusive evidence of biological remains in the engines or fuselage, leading experts to reconsider this theory.The preliminary report suggests that the aircraft may have been hit by an unknown object before losing control, which aligns with statements from Azerbaijan's president, who claimed that the Embraer 190 may have been shot down from the ground. This accusation has generated diplomatic tensions, especially because the damage described on the aircraft does not correspond to the typical patterns of a bird strike.The report mentions that recovered metallic fragments have been sent for ballistic and forensic analysis to determine their origin. The results of these studies could confirm or rule out the possibility that the aircraft was hit by a projectile or another high-speed object.<h3>The flight data recorder: the missing keys</h3>While the report provides significant details about the last minutes of the flight, investigators are still analyzing the flight data recorders (FDR) and cockpit voice recordings (CVR) to understand what happened in the moments before the emergency.Some key questions that experts seek to answer include:• Was there an explosion inside the aircraft, or was it an external impact? • Why did the hydraulic and navigation systems fail simultaneously? • What evidence do the debris found on the aircraft provide regarding the cause of the accident?The analysis of these data could be crucial to determine whether the accident was due to a mechanical failure, an in-flight collision, or even an intentional act.<h3>Implications and next steps</h3>The preliminary report leaves open the possibility that the Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 accident was not a fortuitous event, but rather that external factors were involved. This finding could have diplomatic and aviation security implications at an international level.<section class="noteSuggested" data-id="35548" data-title="You might be interested"></section>Kazakh authorities have announced that they will continue analyzing the recovered fragments and carry out a detailed inspection of the aircraft’s systems. Meanwhile, a final report is expected in the coming months, which could clarify the true causes of the accident and potentially modify the official version of events.

Kazakhstan Releases Preliminary Report on Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 Crash

In the early hours of Friday, a Molotov cocktail attack occurred at the entrance of the IV Air Brigade in Mendoza, Argentina, sparking alarm in the area.Known as "El Plumerillo," the IV Air Brigade is a key unit of the Argentine Air Force, specializing in fighter pilot training with IA-63 Pampa advanced trainer jets and high-altitude search and rescue operations using Aérospatiale SA-315B Lama helicopters. The modern Bell 407 GXi helicopters are gradually replacing the Lama fleet.<h3>Attack on the Military Base Entrance</h3>The explosive device was thrown at the entrance sign of the military base, located at Avenida Fuerza Aérea, kilometer 7.5, in the town of El Plumerillo, Las Heras. Fortunately, no injuries or major material damage were reported.<h3>Ongoing Investigation and Previous Attacks</h3>Friday's incident was not an isolated case. According to Mendoza-based <a href="https://www.elsol.com.ar/policiales/video-atentaron-con-bombas-molotov-la-iv-brigada-aerea-y-capturaron-a-un-sospechoso/">newspaper El Sol</a>, authorities had already been investigating previous Molotov cocktail attacks against the base, raising concerns within the community and prompting increased security measures in the area. The case, initially classified as an "attack," is now under the jurisdiction of Federal Justice.<h3>Suspect Arrested in Connection to the Attacks</h3>On Sunday at around 1:00 AM, officers from the Special Patrol Unit of Las Heras (UEP) arrested Martín Andrés Contreras, 41, as the prime suspect in the attacks.The alert was issued by an Argentine Air Force lieutenant, who identified a white Fiat Palio matching the vehicle used in previous incidents.Police intercepted the car on Independencia Street. Contreras, who had burn injuries on his hands, attempted to flee using evasive maneuvers but was ultimately stopped near the intersection with Democracia Street.<h3>Evidence Found in the Vehicle</h3>According to <a href="https://mendozatoday.com.ar/2025/02/02/detuvieron-a-un-hombre-por-los-ataques-con-bombas-molotov-contra-la-iv-brigada-aerea-en-las-heras/">Mendoza Today</a>, authorities conducted a search of the vehicle in the presence of a witness and found items consistent with the manufacturing of incendiary devices, including:<ul><li>Two empty Corona beer bottles</li><li>Two five-liter fuel containers</li><li>Packages of bandages</li><li>A roll of used masking tape</li><li>A box of matches and a pair of fabric gloves</li></ul><h3>Release and Court Summons</h3>Contreras was released after his arrest as he had no prior criminal record. However, he was summoned to appear before the prosecutor’s office on Monday morning.Investigations remain ongoing to determine the motive behind the attack. So far, neither the Argentine Air Force nor the Ministry of Defense has issued an official statement regarding the incident.

Molotov Attack Targets IV Air Brigade in Mendoza, Argentina

On Saturday, February 1, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) held a press conference to provide updates on the ongoing investigation into the accident. The session was led by Board Member Todd Inman and Chief Investigator Bryce Banning.Inman reaffirmed the agency's commitment to aviation safety and emphasized the importance of this investigation in shaping future recommendations. Banning, with extensive experience in analyzing aviation incidents, detailed the procedures used to recover and examine key evidence.<h3>Flight Recorders and Initial Findings</h3>The NTSB recovered the CRJ's flight recorders, including the Flight Data Recorder (FDR) and Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR), with the support of the FBI. Both devices, manufactured by L3 Harris, contain crucial information about flight parameters and cockpit conversations. The FDR recorded 400 flight parameters, while the CVR stored over two hours of high-quality audio. A dedicated team was formed to transcribe the CVR and analyze the data in collaboration with the FAA and PSA Airlines.The Blackhawk helicopter was conducting a training flight and may have been using Night Vision Goggles (NVG) at the time of the accident. Its flight recorder, which was also recovered, showed signs of water exposure. Moisture extraction procedures are being applied to preserve the stored information. It has not yet been determined whether the crew had the NVG activated.<h3>Preliminary Flight Data Analysis</h3>Initial data analysis reveals that the CRJ was flying at approximately 325 feet above the ground at the time of impact, while preliminary radar readings from the control tower indicated that the helicopter was at 200 feet. These figures are subject to verification once the full FDR download from the helicopter is completed.<h3>Communications and Air Traffic Control Conditions</h3>Communications between the control tower and both aircraft were conducted on different frequencies:<ul><li>The CRJ operated on VHF,</li><li>The Blackhawk used UHF.</li></ul>This means that while both pilots could hear the control tower, they could not hear each other. At the time of the accident, five air traffic controllers were in the control tower, including a supervisor and assistants. Interviews with the local controller, ground controller, and local assistant have been completed, but supervisors' statements are still pending.Flight data analysis shows a slight increase in the CRJ's pitch angle one second before impact, suggesting a possible evasive maneuver. The discrepancy in altitude readings between tower reports and FDR data remains under investigation. The use of different frequencies between the CRJ and the Blackhawk was confirmed as a standard practice.The decision to change the approach from Runway 1 to Runway 33 was made by the tower and accepted by the pilots after a brief discussion. Investigators are assessing whether the Blackhawk may have exceeded its assigned altitude limit, but additional FDR data from the helicopter is still needed to confirm this.<h3>Accident Timeline (Local Time, EST)</h3><ul><li>20:15 – The CRJ begins its descent from 37,000 feet.</li><li>20:39:10 – Visual approach "Mount Vernon" to Runway 1 is authorized.</li><li>20:43:06 – Contact with DCA tower; pilots accept runway change to 33.</li><li>20:45:27 – The tower reports traffic south of the Wilson Bridge.</li><li>20:46:29 – Automated 1,000-foot alert in the CRJ.</li><li>20:47:29 – The CVR records a "Traffic, traffic" alert.</li><li>20:47:42 – The tower instructs helicopter "Pat 25" to pass behind the CRJ.</li><li>20:47:43 – The CRJ increases its pitch angle.</li><li>20:47:44 – Impact occurs, and recording ends.</li></ul><h3>TCAS Alert and Last Maneuvers</h3>Flight data records indicate that in the final seconds before impact, the CRJ’s TCAS (Traffic Collision Avoidance System) issued an automatic "Traffic, Traffic" alert at 20:47:29. However, it has not been confirmed whether the crew verbally acknowledged the alert.Thirteen seconds later, at 20:47:42, air traffic control instructed the Blackhawk with callsign Pat25 to pass behind the CRJ. There is no record of an explicit response from the commercial aircraft's crew.One second later, the CRJ began to increase its pitch angle, suggesting a possible evasive maneuver in response to a perceived imminent threat. The impact was recorded one second later, with audible sounds captured in the CVR recording before it abruptly ended.As the CVR transcription is still in progress, the NTSB continues evaluating whether the crew had any verbal interaction regarding the traffic alert or ATC communication in the final moments of the flight.The NTSB is still analyzing flight recorder data, radar recordings, and controller testimonies. The goal is to accurately determine the sequence of events and maneuvers leading up to the impact. The investigation remains ongoing, and the board is committed to providing updates as new findings emerge.

Washington Mid-Air Collision: CRJ Received Traffic Alert, Attempted Last-Second Pitch-Up Before Impact

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has indefinitely restricted helicopter flights near Reagan Washington National Airport following a midair collision that left 67 people dead—the deadliest aviation disaster in the U.S. in two decades.The FAA implemented the measure to minimize the risk of another accident as crews work to recover wreckage from the crash in the Potomac River. A FAA official stated that the restriction affects parts of two flight routes near the airport, allowing access only to police and medical helicopters until a full safety assessment is completed. It remains unclear how long the restrictions will last.The crash has raised concerns about aviation safety and the ongoing shortage of air traffic controllers at the busy airport serving the U.S. capital. The region is home to three commercial airports, multiple military bases, and heavy helicopter traffic transporting high-ranking government officials. Between 2016 and 2019, approximately 88,000 helicopter flights took place within a 30-mile (48 km) radius of the airport, including 33,000 military flights and 18,000 law enforcement operations, according to a 2021 Government Accountability Office report.The accident occurred Wednesday night when an American Airlines plane attempting to land collided with a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter, sending the aircraft plunging into the Potomac River. Rescue teams have recovered the plane’s black boxes and are working to retrieve debris from both aircraft. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) aims to recover the helicopter’s black box, which contains flight data and cockpit recordings.The cause of the crash has yet to be determined. Reports indicate that at the time of the accident, only one air traffic controller—rather than the usual two—was managing operations at the airport. While this is considered unusual, it is deemed acceptable during periods of low air traffic.The FAA is currently facing a shortage of approximately 3,000 air traffic controllers. In 2023, the agency had 10,700 certified controllers—the same number as the previous year.Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced plans to reform the FAA. “I'm developing an initial plan to restore the FAA and expect to present it very soon,” he stated Thursday on the social media platform X.

Accident on the Potomac: FAA Restricts Helicopter Operations in Washington Reagan Airspace

The black boxes containing voice recorder data and flight details from the American Eagle Bombardier aircraft that crashed in Washington after colliding with a helicopter remain at the bottom of the Potomac River, preventing investigators from accessing their contents.The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the agency leading the investigation into the crash, shared this update on Thursday, January 30, according to <a href="https://aeroin.net/caixa-preta-do-aviao-da-american-que-colidiu-em-washington-ainda-esta-na-agua/#google_vignette">Aeroin</a>.During a press conference, an NTSB spokesperson confirmed that the black boxes are still inside the aircraft. Initial assessments suggest no visible damage to the fuselage in the area where the recorders are located. However, since the wreckage of the Bombardier CRJ-700 remains submerged in the Potomac River, retrieving the devices has not yet been possible.<h3>Fatal Midair Collision</h3>Flight AA 5342 collided with a U.S. Army Sikorsky VH-60M Black Hawk helicopter while approaching Washington, D.C.’s Ronald Reagan National Airport for landing.The crash, which occurred on the night of Wednesday, January 29, 2025, resulted in the deaths of all 64 people on board the aircraft and the three individuals in the helicopter.<section class="noteSuggested" data-id="35785" data-title="You might be interested"></section><h3>Investigation Timeline</h3>The NTSB did not provide a timeline for recovering the black boxes but reiterated that a preliminary report will be released within 30 days, around March 1.Officials did not disclose how many bodies have been recovered from the Potomac River, which remains partially frozen due to winter conditions in North America.

Black Boxes of American Airlines Bombardier CRJ-700 Still Unrecovered

Ronald Reagan National Airport is the closest commercial airport to Washington, D.C., making it a preferred choice for lawmakers and influential figures who have been pushing to add more routes to the already overburdened facility.The airport features the busiest runway in the country, accommodating commercial flights in an airspace congested with civilian and military aircraft, including both types of helicopters.According to Bloomberg, this complexity is once again under scrutiny following a fatal midair collision between an American Airlines commercial plane and a military helicopter, which left no survivors.<h3>Military Air Traffic Challenges</h3>The Black Hawk involved in the accident was part of a VIP military helicopter unit stationed at Fort Belvoir, southwest of the airport. The pilots in these operations are typically highly experienced and frequently navigate along the Potomac River.Meanwhile, Marine One helicopters, responsible for transporting the president from the White House, operate from Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling, located across the river from the airport. The Pentagon, another frequent destination for military helicopters, sits just north of the airport.Due to the geographical constraints surrounding the U.S. capital, it's difficult for military pilots to avoid transiting through Reagan’s airspace. Investigators will likely examine airspace design, including altitude regulations for helicopters, as part of their inquiry.<h3>Strict Flight Regulations</h3>Reagan National’s airspace is subject to special flight rules, including a 30-nautical-mile security zone. Aircraft entering this space must adhere to stringent regulations, such as continuous communication with air traffic control and strict flight routes.The airspace is also actively defended, with violations triggering immediate military responses, including fighter jet interceptions. Since the September 11 attacks, security protocols have become even more rigorous. This level of protection far exceeds that of other U.S. airports, even those near sensitive locations like Naval Air Station San Diego or JFK Airport in New York.<h3>Ongoing Debate Over Airport Congestion</h3>Airspace congestion was a contentious issue last year when members of Congress debated adding more round-trip flights at Reagan National as part of a bill to reauthorize the FAA.

Challenges of Washington’s Congested Airspace

A preliminary report from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on the recent collision at Ronald Reagan National Airport revealed that staffing levels in the control tower were not in line with the usual requirements for the volume of air traffic at the time.According to the document, reviewed by The New York Times, a single air traffic controller was simultaneously managing communications with both helicopters and airplanes—tasks that are typically assigned to two separate operators.This workload imbalance can hinder coordination, as controllers use different radio frequencies to communicate with each type of aircraft, preventing pilots from hearing instructions given to others.Reagan National’s control tower has been operating with a staffing shortage for years. According to the FAA’s annual workforce report to Congress, as of September 2023, the tower had 19 certified controllers—nearly 30% below the target of 30 employees. Factors such as staff turnover and budget constraints have led many controllers to work up to six days a week and 10-hour shifts.

Washington Accident: Reagan Airport Control Tower Was Understaffed at the Time of the Incident

U.S. President Donald Trump spoke about the air accident in Washington during a press conference, describing it as a "tragedy of terrible proportions.""Our hearts are broken," he said before observing a moment of silence for the victims of the collision between an American Airlines regional jet and a U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopter.<h3>Criticism of FAA Policies</h3>Trump used the occasion to criticize diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies in the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), claiming they had negatively impacted the hiring of key air traffic control personnel."The FAA was destroyed by DEI policies," he said. "They hired people not based on ability, but to meet quotas. We need the brightest and most qualified individuals in these positions."He also blamed the previous administration, accusing former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg of prioritizing diversity over safety."Before my administration, the FAA was recruiting workers with severe disabilities for positions requiring mental agility and absolute precision," Trump stated.Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth backed Trump’s comments, stating that the Department of Defense would ensure that all positions are filled by "the best and most prepared" personnel."The DEI era in government is over," Hegseth declared.<h3>Details of the Crash</h3>The incident occurred Wednesday night when a Bombardier CRJ700, operated by PSA Airlines, was approaching Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport with 64 passengers on board. The aircraft collided with a military helicopter, crashing into the Potomac River.Authorities do not expect to find survivors due to low temperatures and adverse weather conditions.<h3>Investigation and Future Measures</h3>Investigators from the FAA, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and the U.S. Army have launched a comprehensive review of the crash. A key focus will be determining why the helicopter was at the same altitude and trajectory as the commercial aircraft at the time of impact.Air traffic control audio recordings captured controllers asking the helicopter crew if they had visual contact with the jet.<h3>Trump’s Response and Aviation Policy Changes</h3>Trump announced that he will appoint an interim FAA commissioner and reaffirmed his commitment to review hiring policies in the aviation sector."We will restore the standards that once made our aviation industry the best in the world," he assured.Additionally, he suggested a review of military training exercises near high-traffic airports like Washington’s Reagan National Airport.<h3>Rescue Operations and Airport Status</h3>Flight operations at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport have resumed, while rescue teams continue recovering bodies and aircraft debris from the Potomac River.

Trump Blames Aviation Inclusion Policies for Washington Air Crash

An American Airlines employee died in an accident that occurred on one of the ramps at Charlotte Douglas International Airport, in the area adjacent to the passenger loading slots.“Our most sincere condolences go out to the family, friends, and colleagues of the employee during this difficult time,” airport officials said in a statement confirming the death.In the statement, the authorities indicated that they are working closely with the airline and emergency services on the ongoing investigation and that support is being provided as needed.“We are devastated by the accident that affected a member of our team,” American Airlines said in a statement. “Our thoughts and prayers are with the family and members of our local team. We are focused on ensuring that everyone involved has the support they need during this difficult moment.”<figure class="image image-style-align-center"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/01/charlotte.jpg" alt="Charlotte"></figure>While a passenger on a nearby plane told WCNC Charlotte that they saw the employee appear to have been struck by a vehicle on the ramp, airport officials stated that only one vehicle was involved in the incident.“Emergency and medical teams responded to an incident on the ramp at Charlotte Douglas International Airport,” airport officials said in a brief statement at the time of the incident. “There are no significant impacts on operations, and more information will be provided soon.”In 2019, another American Airlines employee died while working at the airport. The airline was fined nearly $20,000 by North Carolina investigators, who found hazardous working conditions. In that incident, Kendrick Hudson died when the tug he was driving collided with a piece of luggage on the runway and overturned.<figure class="image image-style-align-center"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/01/charlotte_1.jpg" alt="Charlotte"></figure>

An American Airlines employee died in a ramp accident at Charlotte airport

After the shootdown of Azerbaijan Airlines Flight in Aktau, the Russian Federal Air Transport Agency (Rosaviatsia) published a bulletin with measures to mitigate the risks associated with navigation signal interference caused by electronic warfare systems used to protect strategic infrastructure.In the past year, Rosaviatsia recorded an increase in reports of failures in aircraft navigation systems and air traffic control systems. These failures are linked to electronic interference affecting signals from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), used to determine position, route, and time.The Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) is a set of satellite systems that provide signals from space to precisely determine position, speed, and time anywhere on the planet. The main GNSS systems include GPS (United States), Galileo (European Union), BeiDou (China), and GLONASS, operated by Russia.GLONASS, developed during the Soviet era, has been modernized in recent decades to provide global coverage with a constellation of 24 operational satellites (compared to 31 for GPS and 30 for Galileo). GLONASS is particularly popular in Russia and neighboring countries due to its high reliability at high latitudes, where some other GNSS systems may have limitations.Augmentation systems play a key role in enhancing the accuracy, availability, and integrity of GNSS systems, especially in critical applications such as aviation. These systems, such as WAAS (Wide Area Augmentation System) in the United States, EGNOS (European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System) in Europe, and SDCM (System for Differential Correction and Monitoring) in Russia, use ground stations and additional satellites to correct GNSS signal errors. In Russia, the SDCM complements GLONASS, providing greater accuracy for sectors like civil aviation and ground transportation.Interference can cause:<ul><li>Loss of accuracy in navigation and route deviations.</li><li>False ground collision alarms.</li><li>Errors in speed and wind readings.</li><li>Difficulties in performing landing approaches and programmed trajectory flights.</li></ul>Although aircraft have alternative systems, such as inertial navigation and ground-based support, the absence of reliable GNSS signals can create risky situations.Rosaviatsia has recommended airlines strengthen pilot training to handle navigation system interference.This additional training should include specific procedures to address failures in both satellite and ground-based systems. Furthermore, pilots should practice landings using non-precision navigation systems, such as NDB and VOR/DME, to ensure safety in adverse scenarios. Preparation should also cover managing critical failures, such as hydraulic system collapses, which can significantly affect aircraft control.<h3>Selection of airports</h3>Another key measure is the careful evaluation of airports where operations take place. It is recommended to avoid those relying exclusively on GNSS systems for approach maneuvers, particularly in areas where interference is frequent.Additionally, flight frequency in areas near restricted airspace or where jamming equipment is used should be reduced, thereby lowering risks associated with navigation signal loss.<h3>Equipment monitoring</h3>To mitigate the effects of interference, ensuring the functionality of the minimum required systems in affected areas is essential. This includes constant equipment verification and immediate reporting of failures to air traffic controllers, who must provide assistance if there are any navigation doubts. Effective communication between pilots and controllers is crucial to maintaining operational safety at all times.<h3>Responsibilities of air traffic control personnel</h3>The agency also instructed air traffic controllers to:<ul><li>Assist flight crews in GNSS interference zones.</li><li>Continuously monitor the position of aircraft.</li><li>Immediately inform pilots about route deviations or detected problems.</li></ul>Directors of air traffic control units must quickly relay any information about the use of electronic interference systems.

After the downing of Azerbaijan Airlines' Embraer 190, Russia strengthens security measures against GPS interference

The Aviation and Railway Accident Investigation Board of South Korea (ARAIB) released the preliminary report on the accident that occurred on December 29, 2024, at Muan International Airport (RKJB). A Jeju Air Boeing 737-800, registration HL8088, crashed following an emergency landing, resulting in 179 fatalities and 2 serious injuries.<h3>Initial Findings</h3>Flight 7C2216 departed at 04:30 local time from Bangkok (BKK) with 181 people on board: 175 passengers and 6 crew members. At 08:54, the crew received clearance to land on runway 01, but at 08:57, bird activity was reported in the area.At 08:58:56, the pilots declared an emergency after a bird strike during a go-around procedure. The aircraft attempted to land on runway 19 but performed a belly landing, overshot the runway limits, and collided with an embankment, causing a fire and a partial explosion.The emergency was declared six seconds after the cockpit voice and flight data recorders (FDR/CVR) stopped functioning due to a dual engine failure. Both systems ceased recording data four minutes before impact, and the aircraft crashed two kilometers short of the runway threshold.<figure class="image image-style-align-center"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/01/jeju_air_report.png" alt="Jeju Air report"></figure><h3>Bird Strike and DNA Analysis</h3>Investigators identified feathers and blood residues in both engines and sent the samples for DNA analysis. The results confirmed they belonged to Baikal teals. This impact caused critical engine failures, severely compromising the aircraft's maneuverability.<figure class="image image-style-align-center"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/01/cerceta_de_baikal.jpg" alt="De Dick Daniels (http://theworldbirds.org/) - Trabajo propio, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11157853"></figure><h3>Ongoing Investigation</h3>The ARAIB will continue to examine the wreckage, engines, bird strike details, and airport conditions. Additionally, data from the flight recorders (FDR/CVR), which stopped recording four minutes before the crash, will be reviewed.The investigation is being conducted in collaboration with the NTSB (U.S.) and the BEA (France). Key priorities include:• Measures to manage wildlife at airports. • Enhancing engine resistance to bird strikes.The preliminary report emphasizes that current findings are provisional and will be subject to revision in the final report.

Preliminary report: the investigation found bird DNA in both engines of the Jeju Air Boeing 737-800

A British Airways Airbus A350-1000, registered as G-XWBE, was struck by lightning during a severe storm at São Paulo International Airport. A video recorded from Terminal 3 captures the exact moment of the impact.Following the incident, the aircraft was removed from service for inspection, causing a six-and-a-half-hour delay for flight BA-246, which was scheduled to depart for Heathrow International Airport in London. The delay was <a href="https://aeroin.net/video-capta-momento-em-que-aviao-e-atingido-por-raio-em-guarulhos-voo-atrasou-65-horas/">reported by Aeroin</a>, a local media outlet.Lightning strikes on commercial aircraft are relatively common, and modern planes are equipped to handle them effectively. Their construction includes features to dissipate the electrical charge rapidly. For example, the metal fuselage acts as a "Faraday cage", redirecting energy across its exterior surface to protect internal systems.Aircraft engines are also designed to withstand electrical discharges, using components that prevent electrical conduction to vulnerable areas. Onboard electrical and electronic systems are equipped with special protections to ensure that critical operations and flight safety are not compromised.After incidents like this, the aircraft is immediately removed from service for a complete inspection. Maintenance teams thoroughly evaluate navigation, communication, and engine systems, ensuring the plane is fully operational before it is returned to service.Events like the one involving the British Airways Airbus A350-1000 underscore the resilience of modern aircraft and the effectiveness of safety protocols in handling these situations.

British Airways Airbus A350 Struck by Lightning at São Paulo Airport

A United Airlines flight between Lagos (Nigeria) and Washington, D.C. descended into chaos after the aircraft experienced severe turbulence while flying over Côte d'Ivoire. The incident resulted in six people with serious injuries and numerous passengers affected.Flight UA613, operated by a Boeing 787, was cruising at altitude on January 23 when it encountered a sudden variation in the aircraft's speed and attitude due to extreme atmospheric conditions. At the time, the in-flight service was underway, causing multiple objects to be thrown around the cabin and resulting in injuries to passengers and crew.Following the turbulence, the pilots decided to return to Lagos, where they landed safely.According to reports from our partner outlet Aeroin, upon arrival at the airport, it was confirmed that:• Four passengers and two crew members sustained serious injuries. • 27 passengers and five crew members suffered minor injuries.In total, the aircraft was carrying 256 people.<h3>Current status of the aircraft</h3>The Boeing 787 remains grounded in Lagos while undergoing a technical evaluation. So far, no additional details have been disclosed regarding damage to the aircraft or the estimated timeline for its return to service.

Six seriously injured after severe turbulence on a Boeing 787 in Africa

Russian authorities have reportedly identified the military personnel involved in the accidental downing of an Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 aircraft on December 25, 2024. Flight J2-8243, operating the route between Baku and Grozny, crashed near Aktau, Kazakhstan, resulting in 38 fatalities among the 67 people on board.<a href="https://aeroin.net/russia-ja-teria-identificado-os-militares-responsaveis-por-abater-jato-embraer-de-passageiros/#google_vignette">According to Aeroin</a>, our associated media outlet, the incident occurred when a Pantsir-S1 air defense system, operated by Russian forces, launched a missile after detecting what was initially perceived as an aerial threat near Grozny. Preliminary investigations suggest that possible interference with GPS signals, used by Russian forces as a defensive tactic, may have confused operators and contributed to the fatal error.Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev has demanded that Russia take full responsibility for the incident, punish those responsible, and provide compensation to the victims' families. In response, Russian President Vladimir Putin expressed condolences and described the event as a "tragic mistake," though he has not publicly acknowledged Russian government culpability.The incident has heightened diplomatic tensions between the two countries, with aviation and security experts highlighting the need for improved coordination between civilian and military authorities in conflict zones.<h3>Technical and Geopolitical Context</h3>The Pantsir-S1 system involved in the incident is an air defense unit designed to counter short- and medium-range threats, including drones and aircraft. Its deployment in the region is closely tied to tensions stemming from the conflict in Ukraine, where Russian forces have implemented stringent air defense measures.Deliberate GPS signal interference, a common tactic in war zones, poses significant risks to commercial aviation, as it can disorient aircraft and lead to accidents if clear airspace restrictions are not enforced.<h3>Lessons and Future Measures</h3>This case underscores the importance of establishing strict protocols to prevent similar incidents. Ongoing investigations are expected to clarify the circumstances of the crash and strengthen aviation safety measures in the region. Additionally, experts have emphasized that defense system operators must undergo continuous training to minimize errors in high-stress environments.The preliminary report on the incident will be crucial in determining responsibility and preventing future risks, particularly in areas where military operations overlap with commercial aviation.

Russia identifies those responsible for the downing of an Embraer 190 in Central Asia

Son Chang-wan, former director of Korea Airports Corporation, was found dead at his home in Gunpo, a city located about 22 kilometers south of Seoul, on Tuesday night. According to the Gunpo Police Department, no signs of homicide or forced entry were found, leading authorities to consider the death an apparent suicide.Son led the state-owned corporation from 2018 to 2022, during which renovations were carried out at Muan International Airport, the site of the December 29 air accident that claimed the lives of 179 people.Although the renovation works at the airport were conducted under his management, Son is not under investigation in the case, according to a representative from the Jeonnam Provincial Police.Korea Airports Corporation, which operates more than a dozen airports in South Korea, chose not to issue official comments on his death, describing it as a personal matter.<h3>The Muan tragedy: the worst accident on South Korean soil</h3>The crash of Jeju Air flight 7C-2216 has been deemed the deadliest air disaster on South Korean soil. It is also the most lethal aviation accident globally since the Lion Air flight 610 disaster in 2018, which claimed 189 lives.One of the key focuses of the accident investigation revolves around a concrete structure at Muan Airport that supported an antenna used to guide planes during landing. Jeju Air's Boeing 737 collided at high speed with this structure, causing an explosion that left only two survivors among the passengers and crew.According to reports from our partner outlet <a href="https://aeroin.net/ex-executivo-coreano-envolvido-com-aeroporto-da-tragedia-com-o-boeing-737-e-encontrado-morto/">Aeroin</a>, the safety standards of Korea Airports Corporation have come under heavy scrutiny following the accident. Critics argue that if the antenna had been mounted on a lighter support, as is common in other airports, the severity of the crash could have been significantly reduced.Although government officials assured that the structure met safety standards, an inspection by the Ministry of Transport revealed that seven airports in the country, including Muan, fail to meet certain standards and require upgrades to their facilities.<h3>Measures following the accident</h3>In response to the incident, the Ministry of Transport announced plans to replace the concrete structures with lighter ones designed to break more easily in case of impact. Updates will also be made to airport localization systems, with lighter steel structures being installed, and safety zones at the end of some runways will be expanded.<section class="noteSuggested" data-id="35466" data-title="You might be interested"></section>Meanwhile, a team of aviation experts from South Korea, the United States, and Boeing is investigating the causes of the crash. However, the investigation has been complicated by the failure of the flight recorder, which stopped working minutes before the impact.

South Korean executive linked to Boeing 737 tragedy airport found dead

The South Korean government announced a series of measures to improve airport safety following the Jeju Air flight accident, which resulted in 179 fatalities. The actions include the removal of structures deemed hazardous and the expansion of runway safety areas.According to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, seven airports have been identified with structures near the runways that could pose risks during emergencies. These include Gimhae, Jeju, and Muan international airports. One of the priorities is the removal of the concrete embankment at Muan International Airport, which may have worsened the impact of the accident.The ministry plans to replace the structures housing the Instrument Landing Systems (ILS) with fragile materials or bury them, in compliance with current installation regulations. This process will be expedited with the aim of completion in the first half of 2025.<h3>Expansion of safety areas</h3>Another key measure will be the expansion of runway safety areas (RSA), which serve as containment zones for aircraft that exceed the runway limits. Currently, seven airports have areas smaller than the recommended 240 meters.In the case of Muan International Airport, the RSA measures only 200 meters, falling short of safety recommendations. If there is insufficient space for expansion, the government plans to install engineered material arresting systems (EMAS), designed to safely stop aircraft that overrun the runway.Meanwhile, authorities are continuing their analysis of the causes behind the Jeju Air flight accident, involving a Boeing 737. The aircraft’s black boxes stopped recording data approximately four minutes before the impact, complicating the reconstruction of events. However, initial evidence points to bird strikes in both engines, as reported by the crew minutes before the crash.<section class="noteSuggested" data-id="35148" data-title="You might be interested"></section>The South Korean government will also review airport safety standards and update its protocols before the end of the year.

Jeju Air accident: Government pushes new measures to enhance safety at South Korean airports

In the afternoon of January 22, a Boeing 737-800 from Alba Star, operating under a wet-lease agreement for Flybondi, was involved in an incident at Jujuy Airport that required the postponement of the aircraft's operations until safety checks are completed.For reasons yet to be determined, a support vehicle equipped with a luggage loading/unloading belt malfunctioned while assisting flight FO5193, which connects the capital city of Jujuy with Buenos Aires.According to airport sources, the smoke emitted by the faulty equipment—owned by Flybondi's ramp service—entered the aircraft, triggering smoke alarms in the cabin, prompting the crew to initiate the procedures required for such a situation.<figure class="image image-style-align-center image_resized" style="width:100%;"><img src="https://aviacionlinecdn.eleco.com.ar/media/2025/01/alba_star_jujuy.png" alt="Alba Star Jujuy"></figure>The company stated that "A failure in a luggage belt assisting aircraft registration EC-NLK, operated by Alba Star for Flybondi, affected the continuity of flight FO5193. There was no damage to the aircraft, nor were passengers affected by this situation. The exact time at which the aircraft will resume its scheduled operation is being determined."Developing story.

Smoke in the cabin of an Alba Star aircraft operating for Flybondi in Jujuy: What we know

The National Civil Aviation Administration (ANAC) has temporarily suspended the license of the AW109 helicopter pilot for 60 days following an unauthorized landing on "La Olla" beach in Pinamar last weekend. This decision came after it was determined that the maneuver violated safety regulations and endangered tourists in the area.The helicopter, registration LV-ZBB, took off from Villa Gesell airfield and landed on the beach without obtaining the necessary permits. As part of the penalty, ANAC demanded the immediate surrender of the pilot's physical license and issued an infraction report that could lead to a financial fine.The incident gained attention when it was revealed that the helicopter was transporting cumbia singer Perro Primo, who chose air travel due to the closure of land access to La Frontera, the venue for a local festival.In a video shared on his official Instagram account, the artist documented his arrival on the beach, encouraging fans to attend the event. However, footage of the aerial approach and beach landing sparked significant backlash on social media, where users criticized the maneuver as dangerous and negligent due to its proximity to tourists.<div class="raw-html-embed"><blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned="" data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFB5R_8xgP7/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:16px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFB5R_8xgP7/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank"> <div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div></div></div><div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><svg width="50px" height="50px" viewBox="0 0 60 60" version="1.1" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g stroke="none" stroke-width="1" fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd"><g transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)" fill="#000000"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></div><div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;">Ver esta publicación en Instagram</div></div><div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"><div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div></div><div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)"></div></div><div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div></div></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div></div></a><p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DFB5R_8xgP7/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank">Una publicación compartida de EL + Q TOSE 🐲 (@perroprimoc420)</a></div></blockquote>
<script async="" src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script></div><h3>Response from authorities</h3>ANAC emphasized that the helicopter's unauthorized maneuver posed a serious risk to public safety and stressed its commitment to enforcing aviation regulations. "We will take all necessary measures to ensure compliance with current rules and prevent any actions that could compromise operational safety," the agency stated.This incident highlights the critical importance of adhering to aviation regulations, especially in heavily frequented areas, and underscores the need for greater accountability among operators and event organizers regarding the potential consequences of such infractions.

Accidents and Incidents

Kazakhstan Releases Preliminary Report on Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 Crash

Molotov Attack Targets IV Air Brigade in Mendoza, Argentina

Washington Mid-Air Collision: CRJ Received Traffic Alert, Attempted Last-Second Pitch-Up Before Impact

Accident on the Potomac: FAA Restricts Helicopter Operations in Washington Reagan Airspace

Black Boxes of American Airlines Bombardier CRJ-700 Still Unrecovered

Challenges of Washington’s Congested Airspace

Washington Accident: Reagan Airport Control Tower Was Understaffed at the Time of the Incident

Trump Blames Aviation Inclusion Policies for Washington Air Crash

An American Airlines employee died in a ramp accident at Charlotte airport

After the downing of Azerbaijan Airlines' Embraer 190, Russia strengthens security measures against GPS interference

Preliminary report: the investigation found bird DNA in both engines of the Jeju Air Boeing 737-800

British Airways Airbus A350 Struck by Lightning at São Paulo Airport

Six seriously injured after severe turbulence on a Boeing 787 in Africa

Russia identifies those responsible for the downing of an Embraer 190 in Central Asia

South Korean executive linked to Boeing 737 tragedy airport found dead

Jeju Air accident: Government pushes new measures to enhance safety at South Korean airports

Smoke in the cabin of an Alba Star aircraft operating for Flybondi in Jujuy: What we know

ANAC Suspends Helicopter Pilot for Unauthorized Landing on Pinamar Beach

Más Leídas de Accidents and Incidents

Kazakhstan Releases Preliminary Report on Azerbaijan Airlines Embraer 190 Crash

Molotov Attack Targets IV Air Brigade in Mendoza, Argentina